New Yorkers Support Expanded Involuntary Treatment for Mental Illness

NEW YORK – A recent survey indicates that a significant majority of New Yorkers favor expanding laws concerning involuntary confinement for individuals with severe mental health issues. This comes at a time when public safety concerns, particularly related to crime, are at the forefront of community discussions.

Key Findings from the Poll

Commissioned by the Association for a Better New York, the poll conducted by Tulchin Research gathered responses from 600 voters in New York City between February 4 and February 10.

• 90% of respondents “totally agree” that expanding eligibility for involuntary treatment will enhance public safety.
• 88% expressed strong agreement on extending eligibility to those unable to care for themselves or meet basic needs.

However, it’s noteworthy that the poll did not delve into specific enforcement strategies or treatment methodologies related to these proposed changes.

Context: Crime and Mental Health in NYC

Recent incidents, including high-profile violent events, have intensified the debate over mental health and public safety. Following such events, both New York Governor Kathy Hochul and New York City Mayor Eric Adams have put forward proposals for involuntary hospitalization, prompting varied responses from their fellow Democrats.

Under existing law, police can mandate hospital evaluations for individuals exhibiting signs of mental illness if their behavior poses a risk to themselves or others. Ultimately, licensed psychiatrists evaluate whether these individuals require hospitalization against their will, a procedure characterized by its complexity.

Public Sentiment and Legislative Response

According to the Association for a Better New York, many New Yorkers recognize an increase in public safety incidents involving those with untreated severe mental illness. The advocacy group argues that offering involuntary treatment is a more compassionate alternative to allowing individuals to remain unhoused and unassisted.

Commenting on the poll results, a representative from Governor Hochul’s office expressed eagerness to collaborate with the Legislature to implement necessary changes, highlighting that 43 other states already have similar laws in place.

Counterarguments: Addressing the Root Issues

Mental health professionals have pointed out that individuals with mental illnesses are not inherently violent; in fact, they often become victims of crime. Critics of the proposed legislation argue that it fails to tackle deeper systemic issues, such as underfunded mental health resources.

NYC Council Member Tiffany Cabán emphasized the need for more effective and less coercive therapeutic interventions, suggesting that current legislative proposals may not adequately address the complexities of mental health care.

Conclusion

As New York navigates the challenges of crime and mental health care, the ongoing dialogue surrounding involuntary treatment laws raises important questions regarding public safety, compassion, and the effectiveness of mental health interventions.